One thing about our existence is that we have a relationship to a source we experience as inspired intelligence which acts completely independent of the ego upon us. Ever present and dormant in and of itself until it interacts with our lives and creates information of psychic experiences. A kind of ordering psychic principle that unites opposites with insight that seems enveloped in energy and erupts spontaneously when we are stuck in a state of repetition, empty words and concepts without any apparent access to our preconscious underlying psychic flow as a connection to the content of a larger coherent whole, or the eidetic forms whose presence creates belonging to it and makes it available to our consciousness. A part of this androgynous whole communicates with the source of what we call intelligence and knowledge in the form of insight. In a cultural sense, it comes into active expression through our inner eidetic father figure in its cultural relationship to our inner person. When they are confused with each other, we get a father figure with qualities that do not belong to it but to a deeper more complex formless experience. We begin to relate knowledge and insight in the form of a father to this source beyond him. Or to this psychic source of insight as to a father of that not only to us but to others as well. We create an exaggerated view of our own importance. To something that our inner person should conveys to us. If I use an older phenomenological language for the inspiration that psychic events of this kind are, it would be that we turn to our surroundings for them to be like fathers to this inner unifying principle of perspicacity, or god. If they should fail as inspirers of this knowledge, then they are false and we behave as they are something we should just deny and get rid of. But it is not the relationship we have to this source that is wrong, or how we express it, it is our ego that identifies itself with them. We make them properties and states that do not occur independently of the ego in and of themselves, to something that the ego itself claims to be the original cause of. But the relationship to the insight and knowledge the ego receives in our consciousness and the inspiration this conveys is coming from a living and spontaneously occurring source beyond it. Deeply rooted in nature itself and in the contexts and affiliations that the counterpart to it in the androgynous whole conveys to us in an embodied way. The ego’s confusion, its narcissism and irrational behavior appear when they are not objectively present in a self-observing way, and if they have been lost to us in others, or something we have learned and been conditioned to by undeveloped fathers and mothers in their inability to express them early in our lives. One thing is certain, if we are ignorant of this, we will make people and things into materialized fathers for the inner spontaneous source of inspiration we relate to in many different ways as a connection to this second center, nexus or traditional image of a supreme being regardless of how we choose to describe the insights and forms of psychological context that this source expresses in a cultural sense. Just by writing this down, I am listening and following many different branches of this indefinable communication that emerges with it as it guides my inner person along them and brings my thoughts and sensations to an intended conclusion within me. This is something that always happens within us at the same time as it also lead us back to its elusive origins. Which is impossible to achieve with just the ego alone.