It is quite obvious from a direct experience perspective that there exists a co-disposed association field, an experience-based interstices that psychology tries to formulate an understanding of. But trying to do it on a strictly neurological basis, through chemical and biological processes, does not contribute to an understanding of these contexts. We do not experience them on a neurological level. As chemical or biological processes in our relationships. But in our co-disposed psychic association field we do so through our and others’ direct reactions and impulses to it. There we relate together and individually to the interstices we formulate together through the ways we form image concepts that give them their translation, significance and co-disposed meaning. This co-disposed field has been given many names in traditional contexts. In addition to what we call psychology, it has also come to be referred to as the Sámi Sáivu, to the bardo in Buddhism and dreamtime among Australian Aborigines. But as a means of dividing embodied experience into smaller and smaller components through analytical meditation, it also leads to nothingness. To its position as the non-polar ground of being that is neither of its poles but is nevertheless the emptiness that makes our dualistic relationship to them perceptible. It is this founding encounter that causes us to laboriously encounter the essential within ourselves, where over time we begin to renew our attention to this original field of ascociation in relation to our surroundings using consciousness as the stage where it is performed.