The mental space we find in our experiences and which is reproduced in both the Buddhist tradition, through bardo, and earlier nature-oriented meditative traditions such as the Sami through Saivo, have in common that they refer to it as experiences that arise by us in a self-observational way translating them as a relationship to this content, not to its descriptions. The references we use to describe what is going on in it and also the origin from which our mental states and processes arise are ultimately those that either give rise to the impulses that guide our actions. Or are those we interact with through meditative self-reflection. Our way of relating to this influence on us can be likened to dreaming. Our daily life is filled with impressions, impulses, thoughts and feelings that shape how we relate to others and to the content that formulates what is going on there between us and ourselves based on how much of this content we understand of its origin in this space. If we suppress it, we will be frightened by the power behind them and we will try to get rid of them through their behavior in others because we are unable to face them in ourselves. In this way, we make others reject their own experiences and suppress what we do not dare to admit in ourselves, and we pass on our own limitations, our attitude and the defenses we use to the inner person who follows us and communicates the psychic space whose content we relate to with our descriptions of it. Our experiences then overwhelm us to the point that we can only relate to them through words and references. Through social norms and rules and the convention that we allow to replace the morality and balance of mind that is inherent in nature itself. In the relationship we establish with ourselves and the absolute ground of being that we continuously communicate with in our self-observation.