traditional thinking is a process of intensity and meaning

For some time now I have experienced that I live i two worlds, one that is about our interior processes, which are part of a totality that surrounds us, defined as psychology, and one that is about biochemical processes that is facts about our physical or bodily world and I am going to use an answer made by Jordan Peterson to a Q and A he had about where he thinks Jung was wrong to illustrate my point (link here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjBkKDvjbFc&ab_channel=PhilosophyInsights). For me it is not about wether Mr Peterson is right or wrong. Or if Jung is wrong, or some psychological school is preferable to another in some way. I am just building my reasoning inspired by what Mr Peterson said. Because we are all inspired to do things. We are captivated by forces that originates from a shared totality beyond our control(see, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4217602/). They create purposes, or our participation in their order of them. One of those psychological powers, or spontaneous independent forms of information is often materialised as a form of a hero. Most commonly in sports but also academically. It may also be depicted such as Geb in egyptian mythology, Radien-giedde in Sami, or Sicun in Lakota. Apart from any concrete form it is psychic energy. Or the energy that makes us ignore our physical Nature and endure or do what we otherwise would not be capable to. It has nothing to do with if we are extroverted, practically oriented, or introverted, creative and socially oriented. We all materialise this energy into specific forms and goes beyond our ordinary self. Introverts may have a disposition that makes it more natural for them to be aware of it as opposed to extroverts. Anyway, in sports today we may take someone we admire and let him or her channel that energy and then we formulate its intensity to be able to focus its expression into certain uses. It’s the same in the academical world. When that is done there are biochemical processes that will fire in our bodies which in turn will make us go beyond our present physical condition and for example build mass, increase our responsiveness and spatial attention. This kind of energy produces matter and make us access information that cannot be solely explained by our bodily appearance only. Our hero’s in any kind of sport can attest to that. In the film matrix, this is shown in a wonderful way in that Neo still has to learn by practicing digital or imaginary simulations, in order to later be introduced to and consciously connected to the matrix. Where he finally experience the true origin of his powers. It is our relation to the experience of the psychological forces behind our imagination that inspires the physical processes to make this possible. We can measure them and detect them as they fires. But that is not being exposed to them. To endure them. To learn something. They are our shared human experiences and they connect us to that or make us sick, pointing out psychological imbalances through our bodies biochemistry, and tell us if we are heading in the right or wrong direction. This is how we learn about morality. In the actual world they are what influences biochemical processes, which shows us a different order in life through how they affect us. If we experience an inner urge that we must change, it is a message that is about our relationship to our inner self, to listen, not that we must change how we look to others. If we go beyond todays materialistic obsession and reverse engineer our approach to life, we will discover our presence in that reality. Whatever we call it, these ”forms” are our teachers and inspirers. They will affect us physically. Just like the Great Mother Earth once taught us agriculture by showing us the constant return of everything. The biochemical processes they materialize in our bodies is where psyche and body meets and are what make us receptive to their influence and to change, to learn about our consciousness in its widest sense.