From my perspective of the mental spatiality we relate to as the purely experiential basis within us, its surrounding nothingness or spaciousness, that is where Saivo, bardo and what in analytical psychology is called the collective unconscious coincide. It is an area that today’s psychology often does not reach as it is more focused on the biological and cellular effects of the content of this interstice that we visually perceive and can reach in self-observation and with direct experience. By both embodying it and transferring this content onto something in our environment without identifying ourselves with what arises when we interact mentally with it, we can let it formulate itself in our mental states and in the processes that proceed from them of this content. We perceive it as a calibrating function in our meditation as we oscillate between this mental space and our conditioning. It is in its echo of enlightenment, and from our consciousness’ interpersonal, social and cultural staging of it, in consciousness, that we realize it. Which makes us transcend it through introjections and give consciousness its content. It is in this gap, in the pure original and non-dualistic absolute ground, that we encounter the mirror-like wisdom when it appears as a reflection of the “other” in consciousness as a subset of the nothingness and extension of mental space, which makes it grow and discover itself and the origin that is something that makes it go beyond its habitual and dualistically conditioned limits.