Our current cognitive perception of what it really is that constitutes our distorted relationship to the world in and around us is probably that we force intuition to function as sensation. Because in our collective social contexts, it’s about learning to come to terms with, and agreeing that intuition should function as an apostle for society’s unspoken conventions where feeling and above all intuition is devalued to be recognized as subordinate, and as a disturbing noise in their relationship to sensation and thought. Let alone that feeling or intuition may be the natural cognitive functions we are actually born with and possess. They will nevertheless be disfavored and even devalued, with the result that our innate cognitive disposition will be distorted when we try to turn it into functioning as sensation, or into thinking, by trying to force them to act as the preferred modes that is used by our social environment to relate to our world from within. But regardless of this, we will still own these features, or ways of interpreting our experiences. Sensation tells us that something is, it serves as our reference to our ideas, conceptions, impressions, impulses and instincts. The thought speaks of what they are. Do they come from the within of the without and from our relationship to independent psychic factors, or do they belong to the concrete, tangible physical reality. They are still going to affect us in the same way. The feeling function judges the value of them according to its intensity. If we have to defend ourselves against its overwhelning intensity or let it show us the way. Whereas intuition tells us what the actual content of our sensations consists of. In the end, it is about the fact that everything originally arises in the psychic flow from one and the same immeasurable source. And how we interpret what it contains is determined by how our ego makes this possible for us. Myers Briggs and other test like it in this sense, as I have met them, is a blunt tool when it is used as a personality test, since our personality also relates to something that is timelessly repeated in man, and infinitely greater than any of the functions the ego uses to interpret and assimilate its content. This, of course, is also my innate way of relating and observing the collective consciousness from the outside, which my superego wants to articulate to me from within it as a desirable way to function by suppressing what my genuine emotions and independent psychological properties are and emerge from. Unless they clearly favor its numbing conventionality, and so long as our ability to grasp the relationship between us and the abstract psychic beings that involve our life in theirs does not call into question the status of the collective and its superego.