It is the same attempt to circumvent what we experience as psychologically contradictory, incoherent and disorderly, but on a larger scale. The same attempt to convey psychological motives and their underlying structural influence socially and societally as we once tried to do it in our first family. It does not matter whether it is about our closest relationships or relationships that are societal and have a collective scope. It is about reaching what is behind the inner parental couple also between them and others. By doing so, we try to put everything right. Their ability to express the inner person who appears in relation to them within the personal psychological atmosphere and the common whole they convey culturally of which we are also a part together with others. This means that both we and others find ourselves in a psychological reality that we interact with in each other. Where we also communicate with ourselves at the same time without littering ourselves with the mess and confusion that comes when they are missing in others, as they act as a unifying function for our access to the greater whole they naturally support within us. When they are unconsciously absent in our psychic environment, we are in a disarray that we spread around us, and we, together with others in such an atmosphere, or in relationships where this is prevalent, want to go in and arrange, set things right, correct and recreate the harmony again with the original whole. Which is of course impossible. No matter how much we want to and try, we cannot be in others between them and themselves. Nor can we take over or be what it is that prevents them from this within them. If we only act immediately on our impulses without any self-observation, we become unwitting motives for the forms of psychic energy that act on us. We become contentless agents of what we have not yet encountered within ourselves or completely ignore. The belonging and context that our inner family creates for the guidance we receive from the unknown innermost source of this ancient whole cannot be replaced by anyone or anything other than their intermediary meaning and cultural function. And they can only be rediscovered by ourselves, alone. In an older traditional Sami context, our inner parental pair was conceptualized in Máderáhttje and Máttaráhkká. If it weren’t for them, we wouldn’t be here. There would be no second birth. No awakening. We would have no psychic presence, which is something that there is still too little of in our relationships than we or our world needs right now. It is not our bad conscience that we should come to terms with, but the parental couple who, in a cultural sense, convey belonging and connection with the greater whole we experience in our self-observation, and the communication we have with the source that constantly gives us guidance from within. Which in traditional Sámi corresponds to the presence of Rádienáhttje and Rádienáhkká.