I don’t only interact with people who are around me if they are in that sense in my immediate physical proximity. But also with people in a larger psychological context that includes that they do not need to be present in a physical form in order for us to be able to have a meaningful conversation with each other. Many things in this inner context have remained within us for many generations without its influence on us there having been clarified. We remain in cycles of psychologically unhealthy relationships to important sources of advice and information within us. In a psychic existence between them and ourselves where their intense conceptualization does not allow them to take the form we need to be able to receive what they convey of interpersonal significance. In that sense, our inner person remains in a state that is too limited for us. Which leads to that others in our relationship to this psychic reality are being held responsible for the conflicts between us and ourselves that we experience there. Now that I am writing this, it occurs to me that it might just as well work to relate to it as the personal unconscious as to Jáhbmeaimo. For what is essential is how we interact with the psychic content in them, and to the inflow of information that comes from the underlying characters we have our conversation with. The difference lies in whether we have an internal counterpart in our conversation or whether we merely interpret the information as independent of them. Not allowing anyone else to participate here seems both inhumane and cruel and only adds to an awful sense of exclusion. Of not being present or belonging to any genuine human psychological context.