I think I now actually understand the concept of individuation used in analytical psychology. The embodied path to insight that is built into life itself, which makes the understanding of the temporary through the composite clear. Something that we perceive through our mind. Consciousness is illuminated when the built-in energy of a certain psychic content is released and we observe it as it appears in it and then disappears or passes into insight and subsides as the intensity of the energy content decreases and finally ceases. We put it together with our thoughts and decide whether they are acceptable or not with perceptions that are based on feeling, together they are also composed of the conditioning that characterizes how we see ourselves and whose dualism creates the confusion that insight tries to calibrate and is the one that also separates us from the content that is not compatible with what is accepted and conditioned. But when we realize that what we coherently perceive as our person does not have an independent existence but ultimately rests on its functional parts, the psychic structural whole they form together, then nothingness emerges as a perspective from which we realize that we are enlightened about the parts in the larger context we encounter between them. It is this dynamic approach to matters and the view of ourselves that makes us discover the enlightenment that is built into all its parts. Which makes us try to free ourselves from the shackles of a fixed and unchangeable mind, and renounce the dualism it creates that prevents us from seeing that nothing is permanent. Not even those parts of ourselves that we coherently relate to as our own person. Individuation is the consciously established relationship to this inherent knowledge as the path to this understanding of the embodied in our mental and psychic reality seen against the background of the original whole. What makes it possible is that we can experience in detail, discern and separate the original psychic content that appears in the field of our mind from the underlying nothingness, which consciousness illuminates by them releasing their inherent energy into it, and our senses associate us with through our sensations that we then observe through our reactions to them. That is what we call meditation. Or unconsciously relate to as absent-mindedness. I also believe that this is why psychology as a field of knowledge has emerged. Because a need to meet this has begun to emerge in humans as parts of the collective. The understanding of the impermanent and relative in every composite sense has been known in the smallest components of existence for a long time. But something similar has been rejected in psychology because experience-based and composite mental structures and their psychic content cannot be transferred directly to material and physiological contexts based on cause and effect. Whereby the psychic reality and its psychic content cannot be directly translated physiologically in a dependent relationship between properties and events in a composite experience-based way to each other. Behavior and experience are not considered as content in its own right in a strict physiological interpretation of mental activity, or its structure, or the psychic content of the mind we associate with our experiences in their relation to our world. They are still far apart in the individual, in our composite view of the relationship to the social and cultural from the individual and personal point of view.