Regarding the Nobel Prize in Medicine, the method is described as ”one that makes it possible to show how nerve cells shape memories, emotions, and behaviors in a living brain”. The method has also been used to demonstrate which neural circuits control specific characteristics associated with conditions such as psychiatric diagnoses. Of course its about developing accurat medical treatments. But it is also about a whole network of neurological circuits, connected by a set of circuits that are naturally regulated by a field of mental processes assiciated with them and how our perception relates to them in relation to our mind. However, it is not made clear that it is the interaction with our senses that naturally activates these neural circuits, circuits that also maintain their activity and continuously combine it with that of others. I hypothesize that it is our psychological activity that generates their various active states through the mental processes governing them. In themselves, they are devoid of content or the information provided by mental activity unless linked to life sustaining functions or activated by our attention to our mental processes and our participation in the mental structure whose psychological functions trigger these neural circuits; these circuits then naturally switch state as part of individual mental processes and our psychological activity, our development and maturation. Inhibitions affecting these neural circuits impact biological and psychological functioning; conversely, if the circuits function normally but are never activated due to psychologically conditioned inhibitions, this can give rise to their inactivity and to psychological problems. In this sense its a wonderful discovery. But the means to attain them are absolutely horrible. In any case, Tarski’s undefinability theorem has once proven that a formal language cannot define its own concept of truth. To avoid this, one can view psychological experiences as a set of processes, a way of activating the circuits in a mental network of circuits specific to areas in the mind, that transfers the content we become aware of as it emerges in our consciousness, and thereby engage with the experience conveyed by our senses through the body’s biochemical processes. But no matter how much we break these processes down into ever smaller components, what ultimately remains is the nothingness that follows every mental event as its ”space,” or the emptiness that serves as the condition for its existence. Something man has always done with space as part of the ”spaciousness” our mind also provide us with. Which when we perceive them, during self-reflection, and observe its content without identifying with its mere appearences, become aware of. It is precisely under these conditions that Tarski’s undefinability theorem becomes illuminating and affords us the scope to view the discovery beyond itself. Because every physical and mental phenomenon depends on prior and surrounding causes, they have no existence in itself. In this sense, the mind is not crafting the reality of the body, and the body is not crafting the reality of the mind. They participate in crafting reality as an emanated view of conditional circumstances we label as existence or our ongoing definition and labelling of reality.