One thing that strikes me about our psychic reflection and our scientific relationship to it is that the intra-subjective experience of that which simultaneously exists between us and ourselves, and in others and themselves is not considered to be evidence based from a scientific standpoint. Experience in this sense as something we embody and bear witness to directly as coming from an objective influence formulated by the individual experiences of it, of what is the objective relation we share of psychic events, is not considered to fall under the scientific falsification requirement. Obviously, an all too narrow scientific thought which itself is part of that experience does not actually realize that it has just done so. The psychic content that appears in our relationship to that in ourselves and its ability to simultaneously also be able to arise in others makes the very experience of what it is falsifiable. The falsification requirement arises in our inability to understand or convey the interior content of the background we share. By denying it, it, or not even perceive it, we actually falsify our experience of it. Its lack of a relationship to our psychic consciousness is tested as non existent. We are not just confusing a scientific falsification requirement with a need of a personal deniability. Since there is no connection between the inner objective person, its nature as a psychic phenomenon and its outer context by the subjective ego, it have actually been tested. We can do this everyday in its communication with the objective counterpart of others within, in our psychic consciousness. After all, it happens all the time in our response from their objective inner person to our subjective expectations and how they are fulfilled or neglected in our relation to the layers of our psychic experience. How we formulate what arises in our relationship to that in our external world is a result of how we relate to that world within us. Science is not only how we observe the world we are in, but also how we observe the experience of that world within us. We have known about this as psychic reflection since the dawn of man. The point is that the attitude of our subjective outer person turns into a sensitive and fragile defense when we suppress its communication to the objective conversation we always have within us and ourselves, since it is something that we also are in with others, between them and themselves. It is clear that we do not always want to see what it reflects back to us. Our defenses make it obvious to us that we are not ready to accept what it shows us about ourselves, so we blame it on others who get to take over the role of our objective inner person. That’s when we should seek it out, and value our fellowship with it in privacy and independence, because we don’t really have attained the ability to be with it with others yet.