There is a threshold within us. When we step over it, we stop seeing ourselves only through time, but we begin to see ourselves also through space. We begin to be influenced by, and attribute psychic impressions as something that also appears with characteristics we otherwise only impute to bodily phenomena. Our inner person now also turns our vision into our non-material larger psychologically perceived whole. An omnipresent space in which our inner person acts as our messenger, along with his raw and impulsive second nature as his irrational uncivilized and impulsive twin. Which constantly challenge our personal psychic balance between them. And in this space we also interact with psychic phenomena in the same way as we do the material world. We begin to see bodily and material properties in an underlying way, and begin to treat non-material psychic phenomena as if they affected us and had the same influence on us as any other material external object, and that we begin to perceive qualities that affect us also as separate from the corporeal, and as something that goes beyond that in a psychic sense where we begin to function as vessels for it, which embody our inner person as our participation in it. Also, we suddenly become aware that we have to change our language and the way we express ourselves in order to also be able to convey the emerging way in which we now see the world around us. However, people around us also struggles, and often try to suppress the intrusiveness that arises by our inner person and above all his second Nature, in their attempts to make us not to pay attention to the influence they have on them. What we fail to recognise then is that our inner person and his still uncivilized and neglected impulsive advesary in his unbalanced relationstip to us, his irrationality, trickery, and evasive way of constantly thwarting the feeling of being present in a sincere, personal and participatory way in our psychic space, depends entirely on us. In recognizing our relation to both of them. Often in open conflict where one of the two is placed outside of us in some form. This is what we call life. Where there is always something else in a constant squabbling within us as an excuse for not accepting any participation in it, even though we are constantly part of it, interacting with them. In this way, it always turns into an argument of opposites between them within us, which we then transfer either as one or the other to people around us. Which makes us personally, as groups, or entire nations psychologically constipated. But behind it all is another voice, the voice of the inner center pushing us out of this, and into another kind of a purpose, and with its own self-regulating unity of opposites. Where we can become individual vessels separate from others in our own personal way and in relation to the greater self-organising whole that arises from the world of within that we constantly interact with together with them. Which is not possible until we have reconciled ourselves with the neglected second nature of our inner person.