Almost everywhere in the West, when we attend to the experience of the essence of our individuality and its center as the sense we have of a greater whole, to the source of which the inner personality is related, its energy, and the origin of that who acts as a counselor between all opposites. The cultural aspect of our inner parents are always ignored, which confuses the original experience of them with the unification of opposites and with other kindred personal psychic experiences. But above all, with the cultural aspect of the interpersonal father. Or the concept of Máderáhttje in sami. His role and function as the one who distinguishes between all opposites, who discerns that which arises when it is embodied nature by his counterpart, who refers to the wisdom and that exaltation that transcends pure reason, our psychic reflection and transformation when its contents is brought to consciousness and then related to our ego by him there. That dynamic always ceases when they are blended together as a single inner figure of some universally overarching all-inclusive kind. We are never able to interact with them. With their involvement. We act on their behalf and don’t know why. Which distances us from other people and even make them hostile to us because we interfere with their own unique and personal relation to its influence, and what they try to convey to them. As our cultural inner parents they are there to help and guide us, to stand our ground, but under these circumstances, this does not make any sense to us because we think that we are what they are. We experience what they are trying to show us as if it were something we invented ourselves, as a product of our own ego, and not something that is coming from them. From the dynamics of our psychological parents and what they try to refer us to. This is, and has always been confusing to me.